Rare earth elements (REEs) may not dominate headlines like oil or gold, but they are the backbone of modern technology, green energy, and defense systems. For traders, understanding the strategic importance of REEs, who controls their supply, and how they fuel global trade tensions is essential for navigating market volatility and spotting opportunities.
In this post, we’ll break down why REEs matter, which countries hold the reins, and how their control shapes the escalating global trade war.
Rare earth elements, a group of 17 metallic elements including neodymium, dysprosium, and yttrium, are critical to industries driving the 21st-century economy. Despite their name, REEs are relatively abundant in the Earth’s crust, but their extraction and processing are complex, costly, and environmentally challenging. Their unique magnetic, luminescent, and electrochemical properties make them irreplaceable in:
The International Energy Agency projects a dramatic spike in REE demand under net-zero pathways, driven by EVs and renewable energy.
For traders, this rising demand signals potential price volatility and investment opportunities in mining, processing, and related tech sectors. However, supply chain vulnerabilities and geopolitical tensions add layers of risk.
The global REE supply chain is heavily concentrated, with a few key players dominating production and processing:
This concentration creates a supply chain chokepoint, with China holding unparalleled leverage. Traders should note that disruptions in one region—such as Myanmar’s 2024 production halt—can trigger global price spikes.
The strategic importance of REEs has made them a flashpoint in the U.S.-China trade war, with ripple effects across global markets. China has weaponized its dominance through export restrictions, as seen in 2010 when it halted REE shipments to Japan during a territorial dispute, causing a 97% price surge for dysprosium.
In 2025, China’s export bans on germanium, gallium, and antimony—key for defense and electronics—have escalated tensions, delaying deliveries and raising costs for Western firms. These restrictions, often in response to U.S. tariffs, require Western companies to submit product photos and buyer lists for supply clearance, adding friction to trade.
The U.S. is countering with tariffs and policies to reduce reliance on China. The Inflation Reduction Act and CHIPS and Science Act fund domestic mining and processing, while partnerships with allies like Canada, Australia, and Ukraine aim to diversify supply chains. For example, a 2025 U.S.-Ukraine deal supports Kyiv’s mineral development, though Russian occupation of 50% of Ukraine’s REE deposits complicates efforts.
The EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act targets 10% domestic mining and 40% processing by 2030, but faces hurdles like high costs and environmental concerns.
These moves signal a broader “resource diplomacy” race, where nations vie for control of critical minerals. China’s growing ties with Russia and investments in South America (e.g., Brazil’s 18.3% of global REE reserves) strengthen its position, while Western “friend–shoring” initiatives aim to build resilient supply chains. For traders, this geopolitical tug-of-war means heightened market volatility, with risks of supply disruptions and opportunities in alternative suppliers like Lynas or MP Materials.
Rare earth minerals are not just commodities—they’re geopolitical chess pieces shaping the global trade war. China’s dominance gives it leverage to disrupt markets, while the U.S. and allies scramble to build resilient supply chains. For traders, this dynamic creates both risks and opportunities. Stay ahead by tracking policy shifts, investing in diversified suppliers, and monitoring technological innovations that could reshape the market.